We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Special leave and review petitions dismissed as judgment under Section 124(2) SVLDRS 2019 affirmed with no grounds to interfere</h1> The SC affirmed the impugned judgment interpreting Section 124(2) of the SVLDRS 2019, refusing to interfere and dismissing the special leave petition. The ... Interpretation of statute - Section 124(2) of the SVLDRS 2019 - it was held by Supreme Court that 'It is not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment; hence, the present special leave petition is dismissed.' HELD THAT:- There are no justifiable reason to entertain the review petition. The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 'I.A. No. 97003/2025 is rejected.' The Court, after perusal of the Review Petition and connected papers, concluded that there exists no justifiable reason to entertain the Review Petition: 'we do not find any justifiable reason to entertain the review petition.' Consequently, 'The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.' The decision disposes of all pending application(s), if any. Key legal determinations: rejection of the interlocutory application, denial of review for lack of arguable grounds, and final disposal of ancillary applications. No elaboration on merits or fresh grounds sufficient to meet the narrow statutory/precedential thresholds for review was accepted. The Order is procedural and terse, applying standard review principles-absence of demonstrable error, jurisdictional defect, or intervening revelation of material facts-to refuse re-examination of the earlier adjudication.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
