Special leave and review petitions dismissed as judgment under Section 124(2) SVLDRS 2019 affirmed with no grounds to interfere The SC affirmed the impugned judgment interpreting Section 124(2) of the SVLDRS 2019, refusing to interfere and dismissing the special leave petition. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Special leave and review petitions dismissed as judgment under Section 124(2) SVLDRS 2019 affirmed with no grounds to interfere
The SC affirmed the impugned judgment interpreting Section 124(2) of the SVLDRS 2019, refusing to interfere and dismissing the special leave petition. The Court found no justifiable grounds to entertain the review petition and accordingly dismissed the review.
"I.A. No. 97003/2025 is rejected." The Court, after perusal of the Review Petition and connected papers, concluded that there exists no justifiable reason to entertain the Review Petition: "we do not find any justifiable reason to entertain the review petition." Consequently, "The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed." The decision disposes of all pending application(s), if any. Key legal determinations: rejection of the interlocutory application, denial of review for lack of arguable grounds, and final disposal of ancillary applications. No elaboration on merits or fresh grounds sufficient to meet the narrow statutory/precedential thresholds for review was accepted. The Order is procedural and terse, applying standard review principles-absence of demonstrable error, jurisdictional defect, or intervening revelation of material facts-to refuse re-examination of the earlier adjudication.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
