TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amended definition and scope of money-laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 could be applied to the facts despite the alleged predicate activity having occurred before the amendment; (ii) whether the attached property could be proceeded against as proceeds of crime or its equivalent value despite being acquired through a family settlement; (iii) whether the provisional attachment was vitiated for want of reasons to believe under Section 5(1); and (iv) whether the statements recorded under Section 50 of the Act and the supporting material were sufficient to sustain the attachment.
Issue (i): Whether the amended definition and scope of money-laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 could be applied to the facts despite the alleged predicate activity having occurred before the amendment.
Analysis: The alleged scheduled offence related to an earlier period, but the enforcement action was initiated after the amendment to Section 3 and after the relevant offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 stood included in the Schedule. The offence of money-laundering is linked to the date on which a person indulges in the process or activity connected with proceeds of crime, and it may be a continuing offence. The later enforcement action was therefore not barred merely because the predicate activity pre-dated the amendment.
Conclusion: The objection to applicability of the amended regime was rejected against the appellant.
Issue (ii): Whether the attached property could be proceeded against as proceeds of crime or its equivalent value despite being acquired through a family settlement.
Analysis: The expression proceeds of crime includes not only property directly or indirectly derived from criminal activity but also the value of such property. Where the actual tainted property is not traceable, action can be taken against other property of equivalent value. The record showed that the appellant's claim of lawful origin was not accepted on the evidence, including the bank entries, cash transactions, and surrounding circumstances. The fact that the property was acquired through a family settlement did not by itself protect it from attachment when the value traceable to unlawful activity was being proceeded against.
Conclusion: The challenge to attachment of the property failed.
Issue (iii): Whether the provisional attachment was vitiated for want of reasons to believe under Section 5(1).
Analysis: The material before the authority included the investigation record, the charge-sheet, the prosecution complaint, and statements recorded during investigation. The order recorded a nexus between the material in possession of the officer and the formation of belief. The sufficiency of the material is not open to reassessment if there is relevant material showing rational connection to the belief formed. The reasons supplied in the attachment order were held to be adequate.
Conclusion: The contention that the attachment lacked reasons to believe was rejected.
Issue (iv): Whether the statements recorded under Section 50 of the Act and the supporting material were sufficient to sustain the attachment.
Analysis: The appellant relied on custody-based statements to question admissibility, but the record also contained other statements, documentary material, bank records, transport-related inquiries, and evidence concerning the alleged false explanation of cash receipts. The Tribunal found that the evidentiary material as a whole supported the inference that the appellant was involved in laundering the value attributable to proceeds of crime. The attempt to explain the transactions as legitimate orchard income was not accepted.
Conclusion: The evidentiary challenge failed against the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The attachment was sustained and the appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
Ratio Decidendi: Money-laundering is a continuing offence that may be proceeded against on the basis of the post-amendment act of dealing with proceeds of crime, and where the tainted property is not traceable the law permits attachment of other property to the extent of its equivalent value if supported by relevant material and recorded reasons to believe.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
