Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty under s.271(1)(b) invalid when earlier satisfaction was set aside and assessment reopened under ss.250/147/144</h1> ITAT DELHI - AT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, holding penalty proceedings under s.271(1)(b) invalid where the earlier assessment/order recording ... Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the statutory notices - HELD THAT:- In the instant case, the assessment order passed u/s 147/144 was ex-party wherein the AO has recorded his satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act has been set aside by Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in terms of the order passed u/s 250 of the Act. AO has given effect to such order u/s 250/147 r.w.s 144 of the Act and start proceedings for fresh assessment through ITBA, therefore, there remain no order under which satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) was recorded. Appeal of assessee allowed. Assessment for AY 2015-16 was originally completed by an ex parte order dated 21.03.2023 passed u/s 147/144 r.w.s.144B, and penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) were initiated for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) dated 17.01.2023 and 01.02.2023, resulting in a penalty of Rs.20,000/-. The LD. CIT(A) set aside the assessment by order dated 26.03.2025 directing fresh adjudication. The AO gave effect to that direction on 14.05.2025 by passing an order u/s 250/147 r.w.s.144 and commencing fresh assessment proceedings through ITBA. Since the underlying assessment order pursuant to which satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings was recorded no longer subsists, the Tribunal held there remains 'no order under which satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) was recorded' and directed the AO to 'delete the penalty levied of Rs.20,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act.' All grounds of appeal were allowed.