Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Petition dismissed; quarterly claims required, no budgetary support for July-September 2017 after negative input tax credit balance</h1> The SC dismissed the special leave petition upholding the HC's ruling that the appellant was not entitled to budgetary support for July-September 2017. ... Entitlement to budgetary support for the period July 2017 to September 2017 under the applicable scheme and notifications - rejection of claim on the ground that in terms of the computation prescribed in Circular, dated 27-11-2017, the appellant’s claim for budgetary support, after aggregating the tax liabilities and input tax credit and considering that the balance of input tax credit was in the negative, the appellant was not entitled to any budgetary support for the said period - it was held by High Court that 'Budgetary support under this scheme shall be worked out on quarterly basis for which claims shall be filed on a quarterly basis namely for January to March, April to June, July to September & October to December.' HELD THAT:- There are no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court - SLP dismissed. 'Delay condoned.' After hearing counsel and perusal of the materials on record, the Court stated: 'we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.' Applying that reasoning, 'The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.' The order records that pending application(s), if any, 'stands disposed of.' No substantive reconsideration of the High Court's decision was undertaken; the apex court confined itself to reviewing the record and counsel submissions and concluded that interference was not warranted. Procedural disposition was summary: condonation of delay, dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, and disposal of any ancillary applications.