Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>29-day refiling delay condoned; discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 declined, petition dismissed; liberty to seek other statutory remedies</h1> SC condoned a 29-day delay in refiling but declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, dismissing the petition. The court noted ... Availment of fraudulent Input Tax Credit - adequate opportunity of personal hearing provided or not - relied upon documents (RUDs) which were given were not clear - Violation of principles of natural justice - it was held by High Court that 'This Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. However, the Petitioners are granted the liberty to file an appeal.' - HELD THAT:- The delay of 29 days in refiling the present petition is condoned. It is not satisfied that it is a fit case to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative statutory remedies. I.A. No. 207474/2025 allowed; the delay of 29 days in refiling the petition is condoned. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner. The Court held: 'we are not satisfied that it is a fit case to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.' Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative statutory remedies. The High Court-granted time period for filing the appeal (initially till 15.07.2025) is extended up to 15.10.2025. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.