Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Foreign Tax Credit could be denied merely because Form No. 67 was filed after the due date prescribed under Rule 128(9) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, and whether the consequential interest levied under sections 234A, 234B and 234C could survive.
Analysis: The assessee had claimed Foreign Tax Credit for tax paid outside India and had filed Form No. 67 belatedly. The dispute turned on whether the time-limit in Rule 128(9) was mandatory or only directory. The decision relied on the scheme of section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the applicable DTAA, under which relief for foreign taxes is a substantive treaty-based entitlement. The delay in filing Form No. 67 was treated as a procedural lapse that did not extinguish the underlying right to credit. The levy of interest was linked to the denial of Foreign Tax Credit and therefore depended on the same determination.
Conclusion: The delayed filing of Form No. 67 did not justify denial of Foreign Tax Credit, and the assessee was entitled to the credit in accordance with law and the treaty. The consequential interest adjustments also could not stand on the denied credit.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the assessee obtained relief on the Foreign Tax Credit claim with corresponding effect on the tax computation.
Ratio Decidendi: A procedural time-limit for filing Form No. 67 does not defeat the substantive entitlement to Foreign Tax Credit where the treaty and section 90 otherwise permit the credit.