Retrospective CENVAT credit relief barred where the unamended rule capped capital goods credit for the relevant year.

Rule 4(2)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 limited credit on capital goods received in the relevant financial year to 50% of the duty paid in that year, with the balance admissible only later under the rule. The later proviso allowing 100% credit from 01.03.2002 could not be applied retrospectively to the earlier period, and Sections 21 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 could not enlarge the entitlement where Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 preserved the unamended position. The assessee was therefore not entitled to 100% CENVAT credit for that year.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to avail 100% CENVAT credit on capital goods in the relevant financial year notwithstanding Rule 4(2)(a) and (b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, and whether the later proviso inserted from 01.03.2002 could be read into the earlier period by invoking Sections 21 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.

Analysis: Rule 4(2)(a) restricted credit on capital goods received in a financial year to fifty per cent of the duty paid in that year, while the balance could be taken only in a subsequent financial year subject to the rule. The later proviso permitting 100% credit operated only from 01.03.2002 and could not be applied retrospectively to the earlier period. The governing statute itself contained Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which preserved the effect of the unamended rule for the relevant period and excluded any revival of a non-existent benefit. In that setting, there was no scope to invoke Sections 21 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 to enlarge the credit entitlement beyond the express limit in the rule.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to 100% CENVAT credit for the relevant year, and the Tribunal's view was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The legal position was governed by the unamended credit restriction in force for the relevant financial year, and the appeal succeeded on that basis.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing rule expressly limits credit for the relevant period, a later beneficial amendment cannot be applied retrospectively by resort to the General Clauses Act when the parent enactment preserves the earlier legal position.

---