Special leave petition dismissed for delay and on merits; revision under section 263 unwarranted; original assessment upheld

The SC dismissed the special leave petition both for delay and on merits, upholding the HC's view that the Principal CIT's mere opinion that the assessing officer's estimate was inadequate did not render the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; the HC's revision under section 263 was therefore unwarranted and the original assessment stands.

---

---

The Court stated it did not find "a good reason to condone the reported delay." The Special Leave Petition was "dismissed on ground of delay as well as on merits." Consequently, no relief was granted on either procedural or substantive bases. All ancillary or interlocutory proceedings attaching to the petition were terminated, as "Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of." The order reflects the dual disposition principle: failure to satisfy the jurisdictional threshold for condonation of delay independently defeats maintainability, and the petition was further negatived on substantive merits. No directions or remittal were issued, and no extension of limitation was permitted. The concise order operates as a final adjudication on both procedural (limitation/condonation) and substantive fronts.

---