We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Special leave petition dismissed; interlocutory applications disposed; five-year inordinate delay bars condonation for filing revised return</h1> SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of any interlocutory applications, refusing to interfere with the HC's order rejecting condonation of ... Application for condonation of delay to file a revised return is rejected - as decided by HC [2025 (5) TMI 2193 - DELHI HIGH COURT] this court directed the respondent to decide the applications filed by the petitioner as well as the persons who are petitioners in other connected matters within a period of eight weeks in accordance with law. The impugned order was passed pursuant to the said directions; however, it is noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to challenge the said order to file the present petition. We do not consider it apposite to entertain the present petition in view of the inordinate delay which is almost five years from the date on which the impugned order was passed. HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed and the accompanying interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; no counsel appeared for the respondent. The Court stated it was 'not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.' Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed and the 'accompanying interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.' The decision rests on refusal to grant leave to appeal from the High Court's order, with no alteration to the impugned order. No further directions were issued.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
