Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment of the petitioners' bank accounts could be treated as operative and whether the relief in that regard stood worked out.
Analysis: The bank account attachment was stated to be for a limited period of six months and no extension orders were shown to exist. On that basis, the attachment was not operational as on the date of the order. The Court therefore treated the grievance as having been worked out and directed the banks to act on that position and not continue the attachment.
Conclusion: The relief concerning the bank accounts was allowed and the impugned attachment was declared inoperative.
Final Conclusion: The petition was disposed of with liberty on the unresolved provisional-release issue, while granting relief in relation to the bank account attachment.