Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the orders cancelling the GST registration and rejecting the appeal were liable to be set aside, and whether the petitioner could be permitted to revive registration by filing pending returns and paying costs.
Analysis: A show cause notice had been issued before cancellation of registration, and the appellate order had rejected the appeal on the ground of delay. On the facts, the Court found that the grievance of absence of opportunity of hearing was not made out. At the same time, the petitioner expressed willingness to regularise the defaults and re-enter the tax regime. In those circumstances, the Court treated the dispute as one warranting restoration into the regular tax system, subject to compliance with the pending return-filing obligation and payment of costs.
Conclusion: The cancellation order and the appellate order were set aside. The petitioner was directed to file the pending GST returns and pay costs of Rs. 50,000, and upon such compliance the authority was to consider revocation of registration.
Ratio Decidendi: In a case of GST registration cancellation, where the taxpayer seeks to regularise past defaults and return to compliance, the Court may set aside the cancellation and permit consideration of revocation upon filing pending returns and payment of costs, even though prior notice had been issued.