Section 17(5)(d) bars ITC on professional, legal and consultancy fees for share buyback expenses incurred

AAAR dismissed the appeal, holding the appellant ineligible to claim ITC for expenses incurred on share buyback. The Authority ruled Section 17(5)(d) excludes input tax credit for costs related to transactions in securities, so professional, legal and consultancy fees for buybacks cannot be allowed even if incurred in furtherance of business. Case law on capital/revenue distinctions did not assist because those decisions did not address a specific statutory exclusion of ITC for securities-related activities.

---

---

ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

Issue 1: Whether expenditure incurred by a registered person for the buyback of its own shares qualifies for Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 16(1) of the GST Act.

Issue 2: Whether ITC attributable to common inputs and input services used in relation to the buyback of shares must be reversed under the provisions of Section 17 read with the related Rules.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1 - Legal framework

Section 16(1) entitles a registered person to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to conditions and restrictions prescribed by the statute and rules.

Issue 1 - Statutory exclusions and relevant provisions

Definitions: securities (shares) are not goods (Section 2(52)) and not services (Section 2(102)). Section 17(2) restricts ITC to inputs attributable to taxable supplies (including zero-rated supplies) and denies ITC for goods or services used for effecting exempt supplies. Section 17(3) expressly includes "transactions in securities" within the value of exempt supply. Rule/Explanation in Chapter V prescribes a deeming value of security as one per cent of the sale value for determining value of exempt supply.

Issue 1 - Precedent treatment

The Tribunal/High Court/Supreme Court authorities cited by the appellant concerned characterization of expenditures as capital or revenue in income-tax context or allowance of credit in other tax regimes; none addressed a statutory exclusion of transactions in securities from ITC under the GST framework. The Court relied on the Supreme Court pronouncement that entitlement to ITC is a statutory benefit subject to legislative conditions (treated as supporting principle).

Issue 1 - Interpretation and reasoning

The Appellate Authority reasons that mere use of goods or services in furtherance of business does not automatically grant ITC; eligibility is constrained by explicit statutory restrictions. Because shares are statutorily defined as securities and thereby excluded from the definitions of goods and services, the buyback transaction is not a "supply" under GST. Section 17(3)'s inclusion of "transactions in securities" in the value of exempt supplies demonstrates legislative intent to exclude costs related to securities transactions from ITC. Analogous restrictions (e.g., Section 17(5)(d) disallowing ITC for certain immovable property construction) reinforce that business-use alone is not determinative.

Issue 1 - Ratio vs. Obiter

Ratio: The core holding that expenditures incurred for buyback of shares are not eligible for ITC because (a) shares are statutorily excluded from goods and services, (b) transactions in securities are treated as part of the value of exempt supplies under Section 17(3), and (c) the statutory scheme limits ITC to taxable supplies.

Obiter: Discussion of case law from income-tax jurisprudence and non-GST credit cases (e.g., IPO-related CENVAT jurisprudence) is treated as inapposite and therefore obiter for the specific GST legal question addressed.

Issue 1 - Conclusion

The Court upholds the Advance Ruling: expenditure incurred for buyback of shares is not eligible for ITC under Section 16(1) read with Section 17, and the appellant's contention that such costs are in the course or furtherance of business does not override the statutory exclusion for transactions in securities.

Issue 2 - Legal framework

Section 17(3) prescribes what shall be included in the value of exempt supply and explicitly includes transactions in securities. The Chapter V Explanation to the Rules prescribes that for determining value of exempt supply the value of security shall be taken as one per cent of the sale value of such security, creating a deeming fiction for attribution and reversal purposes.

Issue 2 - Precedent treatment

No controlling authority was cited that overrules or displaces the statutory deeming inclusion of transactions in securities within exempt supplies for ITC reversal purposes; earlier non-GST authorities on capital/revenue character were distinguished as dealing with different statutory contexts without comparable express exclusion.

Issue 2 - Interpretation and reasoning

The Appellate Authority reasons that because transactions in securities are expressly included within the statutory definition of exempt supply for ITC computation, tax paid on common inputs or input services related to securities transactions must be attributed to exempt supplies and accordingly reversed or blocked under the statutory scheme. The deeming provision and the Rule's prescribed valuation (one per cent of sale value) demonstrate legislative intent to require reversal/adjustment for common inputs used in relation to securities transactions.

Issue 2 - Ratio vs. Obiter

Ratio: Reversal of ITC attributable to common inputs/input services used in relation to buyback of shares is required, by operation of Section 17(3) and the related rule explanation prescribing valuation for securities, and cannot be avoided by labeling such costs as in the furtherance of business.

Obiter: Comparative discussion of CENVAT-era decisions allowing credit in IPO contexts is considered non-determinative for GST because of specific statutory exclusion and is therefore obiter in relation to the GST question.

Issue 2 - Conclusion

The Appellate Authority affirms GAAR's direction to reverse ITC attributable to common inputs and input services used in relation to the buyback of shares, relying on the inclusion of transactions in securities within the value of exempt supply and the statutory valuation prescription.

Cross-reference and overall holding

Cross-reference: Issue 1 and Issue 2 are interlinked - the determination that buyback of shares is not a taxable supply (Issue 1) directly informs the requirement to treat related costs as attributable to exempt supplies and to reverse ITC (Issue 2).

Overall holding: The Advance Ruling denying ITC on expenses incurred for share buyback and directing reversal of common input credits is correct and is affirmed by the Appellate Authority on the basis of statutory definitions, restrictions in Section 17 and the rule-based valuation mechanism.

---