TDS credit under VAT cannot be transferred to a subcontractor where the same Form VAT-156 credit was already claimed.

Rule 44(3)(f) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 bars transfer of TDS credit reflected in Form VAT-156 from one person to another. Because the credit had already been claimed by the main contractor, allowing the subcontractor to use it again would create duplication of credit and offend the statutory prohibition. The appellate direction to transfer the credit was therefore without jurisdiction, and the revisional order setting it aside was legally justified. The earlier relied-on decision was distinguishable because it did not consider the express bar in Rule 44(3)(f) or the prior utilisation of the same credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether tax deducted at source reflected in Form VAT-156, issued in favour of the main contractor, could be transferred and allowed as credit to the subcontractor, and whether the revisional order under the KVAT Act was justified.

Analysis: Rule 44(3)(f) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 expressly prohibits transfer of TDS credit obtained in Form VAT-156 from one person to another. The TDS credit had already been claimed by the main contractor, and allowing the same credit again in the hands of the subcontractor would result in duplication of credit. The First Appellate Authority's direction to transfer the credit was therefore contrary to the statutory bar and lacked jurisdiction. The earlier decision relied on by the assessee was held inapplicable because the prohibition in Rule 44(3)(f) and the fact of prior utilisation of the credit were not in issue there.

Conclusion: The subcontractor was not entitled to claim transfer of the TDS credit, and the revisional order setting aside the appellate order was justified in law.

---