Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had shown sufficient cause for non-compliance with notices issued under section 142(1) so as to justify deletion of penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b).
Analysis: The assessee admitted non-compliance with the notices and relied on the plea that the former tax consultant had entered his own contact details on the portal. No documentary material was produced to show that this was done without the assessee's knowledge. The Tribunal held that access to the income-tax portal would ordinarily require the assessee's details and, on the facts, the plea of ignorance was not acceptable. No sufficient cause for the default was established.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271(1)(b) was upheld and the ground challenging the levy was rejected.