Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction permitting transfer of the imported industrial oil from flexi-bags to compliant containers under supervision of the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation, and consequential release of the goods by customs after compliance.
Analysis: The relief was moulded in view of the petitioner's request to shift the goods into containers conforming to the safety requirements under the Petroleum Act, 1934 and the Petroleum Rules, 2002. The Court directed that the transfer be carried out under the supervision and guidance of the concerned PESO , with the petitioner furnishing an undertaking to abide by the directions issued by that authority. Upon completion of the transfer in accordance with the applicable safety regime, the customs authorities were directed to release the goods after following due process in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The direction to permit supervised transfer and consequential release of the consignment was issued in favour of the petitioner, subject to compliance with the petroleum safety requirements and the undertaking to be furnished.
Final Conclusion: The petitions were disposed of with operative directions enabling the petitioner to regularise the mode of storage and obtain release of the imported goods through compliance with the statutory safety framework, while the transfer expenses were to be borne and reimbursed by the respondents.