Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank account attachment under Section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should be released on deposit of 20% of the demand, and whether the petitioner should be permitted to approach the CIT against the order rejecting stay.
Analysis: The petition assailed the attachment of thirteen bank accounts following rejection of the stay request. The Authority accepted the respondent's stand that on deposit of 20% of the demand the accounts would be de-attached, and directed immediate release of the accounts to enable such deposit. The petitioner was also given liberty to approach the CIT within one week for consideration of the remaining demand, with all contentions left open.
Outcome: Partial relief was granted to the assessee by directing release of the attached bank accounts on deposit of 20% of the demand and by reserving liberty to pursue the statutory remedy before the CIT.