Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment over the property could be quashed on the ground that the appellant had purchased it before the final attachment and whether the plea of bona fide purchase could be accepted in writ proceedings.
Analysis: The property was purchased after initiation of assessment proceedings and the transfer was made during the pendency of proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the statutory scheme of Section 281, a transfer made in such circumstances is void against the Department's claim for tax dues. The earlier Supreme Court ruling dealing with the unamended form of the provision was held inapplicable because the relevant statutory language had changed. The Court also held that whether the appellant was a bona fide purchaser involved questions that could not be conclusively decided in summary writ jurisdiction and could be established, if at all, in a civil suit.
Conclusion: The challenge to the attachment failed and the appellant was not entitled to writ relief.