Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diapers are commodities similar to the items listed in Rule 18 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 so as to require declaration of dimensions in metric units and attract penal consequences, and whether the criminal proceedings based on alleged violation deserved to be quashed.
Analysis: Rule 18 applies only where the packaged commodity answers the description of the listed articles or commodities similar to them. The listed items are woven cloth articles such as bed sheets, dhoties, sarees, napkins, pillow-covers, towels and table cloths. The packaged diaper was found to be a composite, non-woven, specially designed absorbent article meant for infant use, materially and functionally distinct from those listed commodities. Even on a liberal reading of the expressions used in Rule 18, the diaper could not be treated as similar to the listed articles. As no obligation to declare dimensions in metric units arose under Rule 18, the alleged contravention and the connected prosecution could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The diapers were not covered by Rule 18, no offence was made out on the alleged omission to declare dimensions in metric units, and the proceedings were liable to be quashed.