Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption on the first clearances of 3500 metric tonnes of paper under Notification No. 6/2000-CE, as amended, and whether the finding that the two manufacturing units satisfied the notification conditions gave rise to any question of law.
Analysis: The authorities below had found, as a matter of fact, that both units were equipped to manufacture paper from the stage of pulp to the final stage of paper and that the clearances for which exemption was claimed were made from the individual units. The Court treated these findings as pure findings of fact and noted that the revenue did not successfully put them in issue. On that basis, the impugned order did not disclose any question of law warranting interference in appeal.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the exemption, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.