Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from providing vessels for transportation to entities engaged in offshore exploration activities were taxable under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or were governed by Article 21(4) of the India-Norway DTAA.
Analysis: The assessee was not itself engaged in exploration or exploitation of the seabed or subsoil or their natural resources, so the deeming rule in Article 21(2) and the limitation in Article 21(3) did not apply. The receipts arose from the operation of vessels used for transportation in connection with such offshore activities, which fell within Article 21(4). The treaty provision specifically covered profits from transportation of supplies or personnel and operation of tugboats and other vessels auxiliary to such activities. Since the special treaty article governed the income, domestic computation under section 44BB could not be applied.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the receipts were held taxable under Article 21(4) of the India-Norway DTAA rather than under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee derives income from operating vessels for transportation in aid of offshore exploration activities, and is not itself engaged in exploration or exploitation of seabed or subsoil resources, the specific treaty provision governing such vessel operations prevails over the general domestic presumptive taxation provision.