Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>SLP dismissed; remitted under Section 98(4) CGST Act for fresh advance ruling on reverse charge and Exemption No.18</h1> <h3>Commercial Tax Department, Rajasthan Versus M/s. Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd & Ors.</h3> SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the High Court's order remitting the advance ruling matter to the AAR under Section ... Scope of Advance Ruling application - Liability of recipient of good or services to pay tax on reverse charge basis - exemption under Serial No.18 of N/N.12/2007 Central Tax (Rate) - it was held by High Court that 'The matter is remitted back to AAR for deciding the application afresh under Section 98(4) of the CGST Act.' HELD THAT:- It is not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the question of law raised by the petitioner is kept open. Permission to file the Special Leave Petition was granted and delay condoned. The Court heard counsel for the petitioner. The Court stated: 'We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the question of law raised by the petitioner is kept open.' The petition was therefore dismissed for want of interference with the High Court's decision, while preserving the substantive legal issue for future consideration. All pending applications stood disposed of.