1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Order set aside on excess IGST and late fee; petitioner must deposit 25% disputed tax and file reply</h1> HC quashed the impugned order concerning excess IGST claim and late fee liability for failure to consider the petitioner's reply, subject to the ... Excess claim of IGST in GSTR 10, late fee liability - petitioner submits a reply to the show cause notice in respect of all aspects and the same has not been considered in the impugned order - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- The impugned order stands quashed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax, in cash to the Electronic Cash Register, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall file a reply to the show cause notice that preceded the impugned order within such time. The impugned order, which stands quashed, shall be treated as addendum to the show cause notice. The respondents shall endeavour to pass a fresh order on merits as expeditiously as possible after hearing the petitioner. Petition disposed off. Writ petition challenging impugned order dated 17.02.2025 for tax period April 2020-March 2021. Petitioner failed to reply to Form GST DRC 01 show cause notice dated 25.11.2024; a belated reply was filed but not accepted. Petitioner contended impugned order addressed only excess IGST claim in GSTR-10 and late fee, leaving apportionment between exempted turnover and taxable turnover unadjudicated. Statutory limitation for appeal expired on 16.05.2025; condonable period expired on 16.06.2025; writ filed on 28.08.2025. Relied authorities: Singh Enterprises v. CCE (2008) 3 SCC 70 and Assistant Commissioner (CT), LTU, Kakinada v. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Ltd. (2020 SCC Online SC 440) that 'the appeal cannot be entertained beyond the statutory period of limitation.' Impugned order is set aside but 'stands quashed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax, in cash to the Electronic Cash Register, within a period of 30 days.' Petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice; impugned order to be treated as 'addendum to the show cause notice' and fresh order to be passed after hearing. Non-compliance will render writ dismissed and leave respondents to proceed under GST enactments.