Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order recovering refund of input tax credit was liable to be interfered with on the ground that the purchases were not reflected in GSTR-2A, certain items fell within blocked input tax credit, and the petitioner had not produced supporting documents.
Analysis: The materials placed before the Court showed that some purchases did not reflect in GSTR-2A and that certain claims related to blocked input tax credit, which cannot be availed. The petitioner was required to substantiate the refund claim by producing relevant documents, but the record did not show such substantiation. The Court found no merit in the challenge to the impugned order.
Conclusion: The recovery of the refund was upheld and the writ petition was dismissed.