Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 2,53,000 as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis of alleged client code modification in share transactions, was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee denied having entered into any transaction with the broker and specifically denied ownership of the relevant shares on the date of the alleged transaction. The Revenue did not bring on record documentary evidence showing that the assessee owned or sold the shares or that the alleged client code modification actually related to the assessee. In the absence of material proving the transaction attributed to the assessee, the addition could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not justified and was deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.