Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the earlier direction for provisional release of goods on furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lakhs required modification by enhancing the security to Rs. 1.73 crores in view of the correct duty liability.
Analysis: The enhanced duty liability was shown to be 20% of the value of the goods under Notification No. 04/2025-Customs dated 1 February 2025, whereas the earlier order had proceeded on the basis of a 6% duty estimate. The lower security amount had been fixed on the strength of that mistaken representation. Once the correct position emerged, the basis of the original quantum no longer survived. The fact that the goods had already been provisionally released on the earlier guarantee did not prevent correction of the order, and a short period was granted for furnishing the additional or consolidated guarantee.
Conclusion: The modification was allowed and the security condition was enhanced to Rs. 1.73 crores, with time granted to comply.
Final Conclusion: The earlier release condition was corrected to reflect the proper duty basis, thereby ensuring adequate security for the customs dues while preserving provisional release on compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: An interim order fixing security for provisional release may be modified where it was founded on a material mistaken premise as to the duty liability, and the corrected security can be directed to safeguard the revenue.