Cheating requires dishonest intention at inception; vague allegations and delayed FIR can justify quashing of criminal proceedings.

Cheating requires fraudulent or dishonest intention at the inception of the transaction; a mere subsequent failure to perform a promise does not satisfy the offence. The Court found no material showing intentional deception at the time of the alleged representation or any cogent facts of dishonest inducement to part with property or valuable security. Vague allegations and delay in lodging the FIR supported the view that the prosecution lacked bona fides. Applying the settled principles for quashing, including absence of a prima facie offence and mala fide prosecution, the criminal proceedings were held liable to be quashed, and no offence under Section 420 or Section 120B IPC was made out.

---

---

Issues: Whether the allegations in the FIR and charge-sheet disclosed the ingredients of cheating or criminal conspiracy so as to justify continuation of the criminal proceedings, and whether the proceedings were liable to be quashed as an abuse of process.

Analysis: To attract cheating, the allegations must show fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of the alleged promise or representation; a mere subsequent failure to perform a contract does not suffice. The materials on record did not disclose any intentional deception at the inception, nor any cogent facts showing dishonest inducement to part with property or valuable security. The delay in lodging the FIR, coupled with vague allegations, reinforced the conclusion that the prosecution lacked bona fides. Applying the settled principles governing quashing, including the categories where allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence and where criminal proceedings are instituted with mala fide intent, the continuation of the prosecution was found unwarranted.

Conclusion: The allegations did not make out an offence under Section 420 or Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the criminal proceedings were liable to be quashed in favour of the appellants.

---