TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the arbitral awards granting the respondent 7% differential GST were liable to be set aside in proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Analysis: The challenge turned on the same grounds that had already been rejected in connected matters involving similarly placed contractors. The Court noted that the earlier common order had upheld the arbitral awards granting differential GST and had found no patent illegality or contravention of public policy. Since the present petitions were founded on identical objections, no separate basis was made out to interfere with the awards.
Conclusion: The arbitral awards were sustained and the Section 34 petitions were liable to be dismissed.
TaxTMI 
