Economic offence bail refused in alleged GST fraud involving fake firms, fraudulent input tax credit, and wrongful refund claims.

Regular bail was refused in a CGST prosecution alleging creation and operation of fake firms, fraudulent input tax credit and wrongful refund claims. The Court treated the alleged GST fraud as a serious economic offence and relied on search material, recoveries, recorded statements and the department's case that the applicant acted as the principal operator of a cartel using non-operational firms, fake invoices and forged or misused identity documents. Applying the settled bail approach for economic offences, the Court considered the nature of the accusations, supporting material, severity of punishment, the applicant's character, and the risks of absconding, tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, and found release on bail unwarranted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution under the CGST Act involving alleged creation and operation of fake firms, fraudulent input tax credit, and wrongful refund claims.

Analysis: The record showed allegations of a large-scale GST fraud involving non-operational firms, fake invoices, forged or misused identity documents, and routing of transactions through multiple entities allegedly controlled by the applicant. The Court took note of the search material, recoveries, statements recorded during investigation, and the department's case that the applicant was the principal actor in a cartel of fake firms causing substantial loss to the revenue. It also considered the settled approach that economic offences stand on a different footing for bail, and that the Court must assess the nature of accusations, the supporting material, the severity of punishment, the applicant's character, the possibility of absconding, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.

Conclusion: Bail was refused. The Court held that, having regard to the gravity of the alleged economic offence and the surrounding material, the applicant was not entitled to release on bail.

---