Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessee retained its agricultural character so as to fall outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite the sale deed referring to industrial use and conversion under section 63(AA) of the Land Revenue Code.
Analysis: The land was found to be situated outside the municipal area and used for agricultural purposes at the time of sale. The conversion into non-agricultural land was to be undertaken by the purchaser after the transfer, and such post-sale conversion did not alter the character of the land in the hands of the seller. The reasoning followed the Tribunal's earlier view in the assessee's own case and the allied decision relied upon by the first appellate authority, holding that a conditional transfer for conversion purposes does not by itself make the seller's land a non-agricultural asset. On that basis, the addition made by treating the sale proceeds as taxable capital gains was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The land sold by the assessee was agricultural land at the time of transfer, the exemption under section 2(14)(iii) remained available, and the Revenue's challenge to deletion of the addition failed.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was rejected, and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For capital gains purposes, land must be judged by its character at the time of transfer, and a subsequent conversion to non-agricultural use by the purchaser does not, by itself, convert agricultural land into a capital asset in the seller's hands.