Penalty under s.271(1)(b) sustained for voluntary non-compliance with AO notices; no sufficient cause found appeal dismissed ITAT, Pune (AT) upheld imposition of penalty under s.271(1)(b) for failure to comply with AO notices, finding no sufficient cause for non-compliance and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty under s.271(1)(b) sustained for voluntary non-compliance with AO notices; no sufficient cause found appeal dismissed
ITAT, Pune (AT) upheld imposition of penalty under s.271(1)(b) for failure to comply with AO notices, finding no sufficient cause for non-compliance and treating the omission as voluntary. The tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds of appeal and sustained the penalty order.
Assessing Officer issued notices under section 142(1) (01.02.2023 and 24.02.2023) and a show-cause notice under section 144 (27.03.2023), all of which the assessee did not comply with and did not file any adjournment request. The sole explanation-that the notices were received by an account clerk who failed to inform management-was deemed insufficient. The appellate delay in challenging the penalty was attributed to the same failure. Section 271(1)(b) was applied; the court reproduced the provision: "(b) has failed to comply with a notice under sub-section (2) of section 115WD or under sub-section (2) of section 115WE or under sub-section (1) of section 142 or sub-section (2) of section 143 or fails to comply with a direction issued under sub-section (2A) of section 142, or". Finding no "sufficient cause" for non-compliance and treating the omission as voluntary, the penalty under section 271(1)(b) was upheld and the appeal dismissed. Order pronounced 28 August 2025.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.