Penalty for concealment fails when the underlying income addition is based on estimation rather than proved suppression.

Penalty for concealment under the Income-tax Act was not sustained because the underlying addition was based on estimated income arising from a mismatch between Form 26AS receipts and the income returned. As the quantum relief had already reduced the addition and the assessment rested on estimation, concealment and non-concealment could not coexist in relation to that figure. The penalty was deleted and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained where the addition was made on estimated income.

Analysis: The penalty arose from an assessment in which the income was estimated on account of a mismatch between receipts reflected in Form 26AS and the income returned by the assessee. The assessment and the consequential penalty were ultimately based on estimated income, and the relief granted in quantum had already reduced the addition. On that footing, the levy could not be sustained as concealment and non-concealment cannot coexist in relation to an estimated figure.

Conclusion: The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on merits and the penalty addition did not survive.

Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for concealment cannot be sustained where the underlying addition rests on estimation of income.

---