TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the electronic material relied upon by the department was admissible despite the absence of a formal certificate under Section 138C(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether the Tribunal was correct in setting aside the demand on that ground.
Analysis: Section 138C(4) requires a certificate identifying the electronic record, describing how it was produced, and relating the device and conditions of production. The provision is pari materia to Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. On the facts, the record of proceedings and the statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, all duly signed by the respondents, showed that the electronic material was produced and acknowledged in the course of investigation. The statements were not retracted, and their contents were not disputed in reply to the show cause notice. In these circumstances, the requirement of Section 138C(4) stood substantially complied with, and the Tribunal's view of total non-compliance was unsustainable. The other objections were left to be examined by the Tribunal on remand.
Conclusion: The challenge to the Tribunal's finding on Section 138C(4) succeeded, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to decide the appeals afresh on all grounds other than Section 138C(4).
Ratio Decidendi: A formal certificate under Section 138C(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 is not indispensable where the record otherwise establishes substantial compliance through duly signed proceedings and un-retracted statements acknowledging the electronic material.
TaxTMI 
