Section 7 insolvency admission turns on proven financial debt and default; NPA challenge and limitation objection fail on acknowledgments of liability.

For admission of a Section 7 insolvency application, proof of financial debt and default remained the ative requirement, and the challenge to NPA classification did not displace that showing. The record included overdue loan accounts, bank statements, recall and SARFAESI notices, restructuring requests and OTS proposals, all supporting continuing non-payment and acknowledgment of liability. The RBI circular cited by the appellant was treated as prospective and not as negating an established default. On limitation, repeated restructuring requests and later conduct were treated as acknowledgments of liability, and the application was found maintainable and within time. The admission order was therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the existence of financial debt and default was established for admission of the application under Section 7 despite the challenge to the NPA classification and the RBI circular; (ii) Whether the application was maintainable and within limitation.

Issue (i): Whether the existence of financial debt and default was established for admission of the application under Section 7 despite the challenge to the NPA classification and the RBI circular.

Analysis: The record showed overdue amounts in the term loan and cash credit accounts, supported by bank statements, the ZLCC minutes, the recall and SARFAESI notices, the corporate debtor's own request for restructuring, and repeated OTS proposals. The challenge to the NPA date did not displace the core requirement under Section 7, namely proof of a financial debt and a default under the Code. The RBI circular relied upon by the appellant was held to be prospective and in any event did not negate the established default. The account statements and surrounding correspondence demonstrated continuing non-payment and acknowledgment of liability.

Conclusion: The existence of financial debt and default was proved and the challenge based on NPA classification failed.

Issue (ii): Whether the application was maintainable and within limitation.

Analysis: The financial creditor had asserted a debt above the statutory threshold and the materials on record showed continuing default from the stated date. The repeated restructuring requests, OTS proposal and subsequent conduct amounted to acknowledgment of liability and supported the creditor's case on limitation. The objection that withdrawal of the SARFAESI steps undermined the Section 7 application was rejected because the SARFAESI action was not shown to have been withdrawn in the manner suggested.

Conclusion: The application was maintainable and within limitation.

Final Conclusion: The admission order was sustained and no interference was warranted in appeal, resulting in dismissal of the challenge to the CIRP trigger.

Ratio Decidendi: For admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the requirements are proof of financial debt and default; classification of the account as NPA is not a substitute for, nor a precondition to negate, established default, and repeated acknowledgments of liability may extend limitation.

---