Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were liable to be set aside by invoking the reasonable-cause protection under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The service in question was brought within the tax net only from 16-6-2005, and the assessee's claim of bona fide belief regarding the scope of Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-05 and the availability of the exemption threshold was accepted. Mere failure to obtain registration, by itself, was not treated as positive suppression of facts. Since the service tax liability had been discharged along with interest, the case was found fit for the statutory relief against penalty.
Conclusion: The penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 were rightly set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.