Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of peak cash credit, treated as unexplained under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, required to be sustained in full or deserved partial relief.
Analysis: The assessee claimed that the cash deposits represented receipts from agricultural operations in a joint family holding, while the Revenue relied on the difference between cash deposits and withdrawals as unexplained. In the absence of complete supporting details of the landholding and share, and considering the possibility of past savings and surrounding circumstances, the addition was found capable of reasonable estimation rather than full sustenance.
Conclusion: The addition was restricted to a lump sum amount of Rs. 86,500, granting relief of Rs. 5,00,000 to the assessee.