Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on the basis of railway receipts where the consignor had not availed the corresponding credit and whether the denial of credit and consequential penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the admissibility of credit for service tax paid on railway freight used for transportation of inputs. The relevant record showed that the consignor had certified that credit had not been availed to the extent of the disputed amount, and the railway receipts contained the essential particulars supporting the claim. On that basis, the appellant was held entitled to credit for the certified balance. For the remaining disputed amount, the matter required verification of the necessary certificate or other supporting documents before credit could be allowed.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to Cenvat credit to the extent of the certified amount, the balance was remanded for verification, and the penalty was set aside.