Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the late filing fee levied under section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961, while processing the TDS statement under section 200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was sustainable for a default relating to the third quarter of financial year 2015-16, and whether the order of the first appellate authority confirming the levy called for interference.
Analysis: The record showed that the impugned order purportedly under section 272A(2)(k) was not in existence, but the revenue established from the intimation and correction statement that a late filing fee of Rs. 85,200 was in fact levied for the relevant quarter. The precedents relied upon by the assessee concerned periods prior to 01.06.2015, when the enabling provision in section 200A(1)(c) had not come into force. The default in the present case related to a period after 01.06.2015, so the levy fell within the operative statutory regime.
Conclusion: The late filing fee under section 234E read with section 200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was upheld and no infirmity was found in the order confirming the levy.