Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's cash deposits could be fully sustained as unexplained income, or whether the presumptive taxation scheme under section 44AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961 warranted partial relief by restricting the addition on an estimate basis.
Analysis: The assessee had been assessed under the presumptive scheme of section 44AD on total sales and relied on the same business results to explain the cash deposits. The direct nexus between the trading receipts and the deposits was not fully established, but complete denial of the presumptive benefit was found unjustified on the facts. The addition was therefore moderated by estimating a reasonable balance amount instead of sustaining the entire cash deposit addition.
Conclusion: The full addition treating the cash deposits as unexplained was not upheld, and the addition was confined to Rs. 2,87,500, granting the assessee relief of Rs. 10 lakhs.