Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants' gratuity claims formed part of the approved resolution plan and whether denial of payment amounted to non-implementation of the plan, thereby warranting review or modification of the earlier appellate order.
Analysis: The approved resolution plan and its annexure were read together. The employee-wise chart showed that employees not on the payroll as on the insolvency commencement date were assigned nil payment, and the applicants' names appeared in that category. The plan had been approved by the committee of creditors, confirmed by the adjudicating authority, and had attained finality after affirmation by the Supreme Court. In that setting, the claims could not be treated as surviving outside the plan, and the later reliance on a gratuity claim could not override the settled terms of the plan. Once the resolution plan has achieved finality, claims not included in it stand extinguished and cannot be reopened by review.
Conclusion: The gratuity claims of the applicants did not form part of the approved resolution plan, and refusal to pay them did not amount to non-implementation of the plan. The review applications failed and were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The earlier appellate findings were left undisturbed, and the settled resolution framework remained operative without any modification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an approved resolution plan, read as a whole with its annexures, expressly provides nil payment to a category of employees and the plan has attained finality, claims falling outside that plan stand extinguished and cannot be resurrected through review on the plea of non-implementation.