PMLA bail refused where twin conditions were unmet, grave money-laundering allegations and custody concerns outweighed medical pleas.

Regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was declined in a prosecution alleging large-scale money laundering and bank fraud through shell entities and falsified accounts. The Court treated the gravity of the economic offence, the rigour of Section 45, the stage of proceedings, the alleged risk of witness influence and the applicant's medical condition as decisive factors. It found that the twin conditions for bail were not satisfied and that the material did not show reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not guilty. The medical plea was rejected because the ailment could be managed in custody, and continued detention was considered justified pending trial.

---

---

Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in view of the seriousness of the alleged economic offence, the applicant's medical condition and the claim of prolonged custody and delay in trial.

Analysis: The application arose from allegations of a large-scale money laundering and bank fraud involving diversion of public funds through shell entities and falsified accounts. In deciding bail, the Court treated the gravity of the offence, the statutory rigour of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the stage of the proceedings, the alleged risk of witness influence and the applicant's medical status as the governing considerations. The Court held that economic offences of exceptional magnitude must be approached with seriousness, that the applicant had not satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45, and that the material on record did not establish reasonable grounds to believe that he was not guilty. On the medical plea, the Court found that the ailment could be managed in custody and did not justify release. The Court also held that the present stage of the case and the possibility of interference with the process weighed against bail.

Conclusion: Bail was declined.

Final Conclusion: The applicant was not found entitled to release at the present stage, and continued custody was held justified pending trial.

Ratio Decidendi: In a serious money-laundering prosecution, bail will not be granted unless the statutory twin conditions are met and the accused shows circumstances strong enough to outweigh the gravity of the offence, the risk to the process, and the societal interest involved.

---