1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) deleted as estimated GP rate reduced from 12.5% to 2% in purchase-sales case</h1> The ITAT Mumbai held that since the AO did not dispute the purchases from declared sources and the sales and quantity records were consistent, the ... Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimated GP rate of alleged bogus purchases - HELD THAT:- Nowhere the ld. AO had disputed the fact that these purchases were made from the sources declared in the books of accounts and corresponding sales and quantity tally has not been disturbed. The addition was made by applying the GP rate by the ld. AO which has been substantively reduced by the Tribunal, i.e., from 12.5% to 2%. In such a case on estimation of GP on adhoc basis, no penalty can be levied u/s. 271(1)(c), accordingly, the penalty confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) is deleted. Appeal of the assessee is allowed. The appellate tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2007-08. The penalty of Rs. 4,25,000 was levied on an addition of Rs. 13,75,308 made by estimating the gross profit (GP) rate at 12.5% on alleged bogus purchases. However, the quantum proceedings reduced the GP rate to 2%, significantly lowering the addition to Rs. 2,20,000. The tribunal noted that the assessing officer did not dispute the genuineness of purchases or corresponding sales and quantities; the addition was purely an estimation based on GP rate. Since the GP rate was applied on an adhoc basis and later substantially reduced, the tribunal held that 'no penalty can be levied u/s. 271(1)(c)' on such estimation. Consequently, the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted. The decision underscores that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained when additions arise from estimation without any finding of concealment or misreporting by the assessee.