Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Common Area Maintenance charges are liable to deduction of tax at source under Section 194I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as rent, or under Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as contractual payments.
Analysis: The charges were held to be payments for maintenance services and shared common works such as cleanliness, utilities and upkeep of common areas, and not consideration for use of land, building or premises. Such charges are independent of rent and fall within the scope of payment for work under Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since the issue was already covered by a coordinate Bench view, no different conclusion was warranted. The addition and the finding of assessee-in-default under Section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 therefore could not survive.
Conclusion: CAM charges are not rent and are liable to TDS under Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, not under Section 194I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue's challenge failed and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Charges paid for maintenance and upkeep of common areas, being contractual payments for services and not payments for use of premises, do not constitute rent and are taxable under the provision governing works contracts rather than the provision governing rent.