Pre-enquiry disciplinary proceedings may be quashed in rare cases where charges lack factual foundation or jurisdictional basis.

Writ interference under Article 226 is permissible at the pre-enquiry stage of disciplinary proceedings only in rare and exceptional cases where the charge appears prima facie without factual foundation or jurisdictional basis. Here, the disciplinary action had not moved beyond the charge memorandum and show-cause notice, and the material did not rebut the documents relied on by the employee. The alleged distortion of public records was also not properly connected to the petitioner on the record. In these circumstances, the initiation of proceedings was treated as misconceived, and the suspension order, consequential memorandum, and charge memo were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ court could interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India at the stage of contemplated disciplinary proceedings and show-cause notice, and whether the suspension order and consequential memo were liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The disciplinary action had not progressed beyond issuance of the memorandum of charge and show-cause notice. On the record, the allegation of distortion of public records was directed against an assessment order passed by other officers, while the petitioner was shown to have been neither the assessing officer at the relevant time nor connected with the charge as framed. The material placed by the respondents did not effectively rebut the documents relied upon by the petitioner. In such circumstances, the case fell within the narrow category in which writ interference at the pre-enquiry stage is permissible, because the initiation of proceedings appeared misconceived and unsupported by cogent material.

Conclusion: The writ petition was maintainable and interference was justified; the suspension orders and the consequential memorandum were not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained complete relief against the disciplinary action at the threshold stage, and the impugned suspension and charge memo were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: A writ court may interfere at the stage of a contemplated disciplinary proceeding where the charge is prima facie without factual foundation or jurisdictional basis and the case falls within the rare and exceptional category warranting intervention before the enquiry proceeds further.

---