Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a tax demand and consequential recovery proceedings under the GST law could be sustained after approval of the resolution plan under the insolvency law, and whether the recovered amount was liable to be refunded.
Analysis: The resolution plan had already been approved by the NCLT, and the governing principle is that all claims not forming part of the approved plan stand extinguished. Once the resolution process reaches finality, no creditor can create or enforce a fresh liability for a pre-resolution period, as that would defeat the objective of a fresh start for the successful resolution applicant and disrupt the resolution process. The impugned assessment order related to a period preceding approval of the resolution plan and was therefore hit by this principle. Consequential recovery made pursuant to such order could not survive.
Conclusion: The GST assessment order was quashed and the department was directed to refund any amount recovered in pursuance of that order.
Ratio Decidendi: After approval of a resolution plan, pre-resolution claims not included in the plan cannot be raised or enforced, and any order creating such liability is invalid.