TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, through Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, declined to adjudicate the factual and legal issues raised in the petition, holding that the competent authority-respondent No.4, Assistant Commissioner, State Taxes and Excise, Dharamshala-should re-examine the matter afresh on both factual and legal grounds. The Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 31.12.2023 and the recovery notice dated 20.02.2024. It directed respondent No.4 to expedite the hearing and decide the assessment for the financial year 2017-18 by 30.09.2025, ensuring that the parties are heard and given an opportunity to file replies and documents. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
