TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Supreme Court, through Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale, dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of the Statutory Appeal before the Additional Commissioner, CT & GST, which was found "not maintainable" due to the petitioner's failure to deposit the mandatory "20% of the tax demanded," a "pre-condition for maintaining such an appeal." The Court upheld the dismissal of the Revision and Writ Petition against that order, finding "no error or illegality" in the lower authorities' decisions. The petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to "explore other alternative legal remedies that may be available to it in law." Pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
