TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Issuing Show Cause Notice to Deceased Proprietor Is Invalid Under Section 93 Without Legal Representative's Involvement</h1> The HC held that issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) to a deceased proprietor of a firm is invalid. Section 93 addresses liability for tax, interest, or ... Issuance of SCN to a deceased person (proprietor of petitioner firm) - once the proprietor of the petitioner firm had already died, was there any occasion for issuing a SCN in the name of the petitioner firm? - HELD THAT:- A perusal of the provision of section 93, would reveal that the same only deals with the liability to pay tax, interest or penalty in a case where the business is continued after the death, by the legal representative or where the business is discontinued, however, the provision does not deal with the fact as to whether the determination at all can take place against a deceased person and the said provision cannot and does not authorise the determination to be made against a dead person and recovery thereof from the legal representative. Once the provision deals with the liability of a legal representative on account of death of the proprietor of the firm, it is sine qua non that the legal representative is issued a show cause notice and after seeking response from the legal representative, the determination should take place. The determination made in the present case wherein the show cause notice was issued and the determination was made against the dead person without issuing notice to the legal representative, cannot be sustained - Petition allowed. ISSUES: Whether a show cause notice and subsequent determination under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 can be issued against a deceased proprietor of a firm.Whether Section 93 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 authorizes determination and recovery of tax, interest, or penalty from the legal representative of a deceased person without issuing a show cause notice to the legal representative.The procedural requirements for issuing show cause notices and making determinations in cases involving the death of a proprietor. RULINGS / HOLDINGS: The court held that the show cause notice and determination issued against the deceased proprietor are void ab initio as the law does not authorize issuance of such notices to a dead person.Section 93 of the Act deals only with the liability of the legal representative to pay tax, interest, or penalty but does not authorize the determination to be made against a deceased person or recovery without issuing notice to the legal representative.The issuance of a show cause notice to the legal representative and an opportunity to respond is a sine qua non before any determination can be made against the legal representative after the death of the proprietor.The order demanding tax raised without issuing notice to the legal representative is unsustainable and is quashed and set aside. RATIONALE: The court applied the statutory framework under Section 73 (demand and recovery of tax) and Section 93 (special provisions regarding liability after death) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.Section 93(1) clarifies that liability to pay tax, interest, or penalty after death lies with the legal representative if the business is continued or discontinued, but it does not confer authority to initiate determination proceedings against the deceased person.The court emphasized that procedural fairness requires that the legal representative be issued a show cause notice and given an opportunity to respond before any determination or recovery is made.No doctrinal shift or dissent was indicated; the judgment reinforces the principle that tax proceedings must be initiated against the correct legal entity or representative.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
