TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST is applicable on rice and wheat flour (atta) supplied in packages of more than 25 kg as "pre-packaged and labelled" goods bearing a registered brand name, or whether such goods are exempt.
Analysis: The ruling traced the GST notifications governing cereals and flour from the original rate notification to the subsequent amendments. It noted that the earlier levy turned on goods being put up in unit container and bearing a registered brand name, but the later amendment substituted the test with whether the goods are "pre-packaged and labelled". That expression was linked to the definition of "pre-packaged commodity" under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and the declaration requirements under the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. The ruling further relied on the exclusion in rule 3 of those Rules, under which packages containing more than 25 kg or 25 litres do not require the prescribed declarations, and on the departmental clarification that such larger packs of cereals and flour do not fall within the GST-triggering description.
Conclusion: GST is applicable on rice and wheat flour only where the supply answers the description of pre-packaged and labelled commodities within the GST notification framework; the registered brand name criterion is no longer determinative. Accordingly, the applicant's claim to exemption for the questioned goods was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The ruling settles that the taxability of rice and wheat flour depends on the pre-packaged and labelled test under the legal metrology regime, not on the earlier brand-name formulation, and the question was answered against exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: For specified food items, GST applies when the goods are pre-packaged and labelled within the meaning drawn from the Legal Metrology law and are not covered by the rule-based exclusion for packs exceeding 25 kg or 25 litres.
TaxTMI 
