2025 (8) TMI 199 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT allows rectification under Section 154 for lesser TDS-TCS credit; directs refund with interest under Section 244A

The ITAT Delhi allowed the appellant's appeal under Section 154 for rectification of lesser TDS-TCS credit reflected in Form 26AS. The tribunal held that ... Rectification order u/s 154 - lesser credit of TDS-TCS available with form 26AS - appellant claims that due to in advertent mistake and not familiar with the form 26AS could not claim the amount of excess tax in the returned income - HELD THAT:- The appellant’s claim is that the case is squarely covered by the decision of own case for AY 2010-11, in Mewat Grit Udyog (since dissolved) through its successor NKB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Rewari, Haryana [2024 (6) TMI 334 - ITAT DELHI] held that question here is not claiming any deduction or exemption, simply the refund of the prepaid taxes which have been paid by the Assessee in excess to the Government treasury and ought to be refunded to the Assessee. Hence, we direct the revenue authorities to refund the amount due for the assessee along with the eligible interest as per provisions of Section 244A - Assessee appeal allowed. ISSUES: Whether the claim for refund of excess prepaid taxes can be rejected on the ground of limitation under section 239 of the Income Tax Act when sections 219, 237, and 240 provide for refund claims.Whether the departure by the Income Tax Department from correct computation of refund under section 143(1)(c) can vitiate the assessee's claim for refund of excess prepaid taxes over tax payable on assessed income.Whether an application under section 154 filed against an Appeal Effect Order under section 254 is barred by limitation when the AO treats it as an application against the Assessment Order.Whether the excess tax paid over the tax payable, as evident from Form 26AS, is refundable despite the AO's rectification order giving lesser credit of TDS-TCS.Whether the decision of a co-ordinate Bench in a prior case involving refund of excess prepaid taxes is applicable and binding for the current assessment year. RULINGS / HOLDINGS: The rejection of the refund claim citing limitation under section 239 was held erroneous as it was in 'complete departure from the section 219, 237 and 240 of the Act,' which govern refund claims.The court held that 'departure of Income Tax Department from correct computation of refund required under section 143(1)(c) of the Act cannot vitiate the claim' of excess prepaid taxes over tax payable on assessed income.The application under section 154 was rightly considered not barred by limitation since it was filed against the Appeal Effect Order under section 254 and not the Assessment Order itself.The excess TDS-TCS credit of Rs. 4,72,147/- as reflected in Form 26AS but not credited by the AO is refundable, and the rectification order giving lesser credit was incorrect.The decision of the co-ordinate Bench in the earlier case was held squarely applicable, directing refund of prepaid taxes along with interest under section 244A, and thus the appeal was allowed. RATIONALE: The court applied statutory provisions from the Income Tax Act, specifically sections 219, 237, 239, 240, 143(1)(c), 154, 244A, and 254, to analyze the refund claim and limitation issues.The court relied on the principle that refund claims of excess prepaid taxes are governed by specific refund provisions and cannot be rejected on unrelated limitation grounds.The decision referenced a prior ruling by a co-ordinate Bench that emphasized the entitlement to refund of prepaid taxes paid in excess to the government treasury, reinforcing consistency in judicial approach.The court recognized that the AO's rectification order contained errors in tax credit computation, warranting correction and refund accordingly.No dissent or doctrinal shift was noted; the judgment affirmed established refund principles and procedural correctness in handling refund claims and rectification applications.