Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Delhi) in the appeal for AY 2017-18 against CIT(A)/NFAC's order u/s 143(1) r.w.s. 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, addressed the addition of Rs. 4,70,442/- representing 85% of the assessee's gross turnover from sale of milk and allied products. The Revenue upheld the addition, noting a 15% allowance for expenditure/wastage despite lack of supporting details from the assessee. The Tribunal found that neither party's submissions were fully acceptable: the assessee failed to prove business expenditure claims, while the Revenue lacked comparable data to justify an 85% profit margin. Consequently, the Tribunal directed assessment of the turnover at a lump sum estimated rate of 8%, explicitly stating that "the same shall not be treated as a precedent." The appeal was partly allowed, with the assessing authority instructed to finalize computations accordingly.